NETGROUP(5) | MidnightBSD File Formats Manual | NETGROUP(5) |
netgroup
— defines
network groups
netgroup |
The netgroup
file specifies ``netgroups'',
which are sets of
(host, user,
domain) tuples that are to be given similar network access.
Each line in the file consists of a netgroup name followed by a list of the members of the netgroup. Each member can be either the name of another netgroup or a specification of a tuple as follows:
(host, user, domain)
where the
host,
user, and
domain
are character string names for the corresponding component. Any of the comma
separated fields may be empty to specify a ``wildcard'' value or may consist
of the string ``-'' to specify ``no valid value''. The members of the list
may be separated by whitespace and/or commas; the ``\'' character may be
used at the end of a line to specify line continuation. Lines are limited to
1024 characters. The functions specified in
getnetgrent(3)
should normally be used to access the netgroup
database.
Lines that begin with a # are treated as comments.
On most other platforms, netgroup
s are
only used in conjunction with NIS and local
/etc/netgroup files are ignored. With
FreeBSD, netgroup
s can be
used with either NIS or local files, but there are certain caveats to
consider. The existing netgroup
system is extremely
inefficient where
innetgr
(3)
lookups are concerned since netgroup
memberships are
computed on the fly. By contrast, the NIS netgroup
database consists of three separate maps (netgroup, netgroup.byuser and
netgroup.byhost) that are keyed to allow
innetgr
(3) lookups to be done
quickly. The FreeBSD
netgroup
system can interact with the NIS
netgroup
maps in the following ways:
netgroup
lookups will be done
exclusively through NIS, with
innetgr
(3) taking advantage
of the netgroup.byuser and netgroup.byhost maps to speed up searches.
(This is more or less compatible with the behavior of SunOS and similar
platforms.)netgroup
information (with no NIS
‘+’ token), then only the local
netgroup
information will be processed (and NIS
will be ignored).netgroup
database. While this
configuration is the most flexible, it is also the least efficient: in
particular, innetgr
(3)
lookups will be especially slow if the database is large.The file format is compatible with that of various vendors, however it appears that not all vendors use an identical format.
The interpretation of access restrictions based on the member tuples of a netgroup is left up to the various network applications. Also, it is not obvious how the domain specification applies to the BSD environment.
The netgroup
database should be stored in
the form of a hashed db(3)
database just like the
passwd(5) database to
speed up reverse lookups.
December 11, 1993 | midnightbsd-3.1 |